Recoil reducing Guide rod - 1911Forum
Advertise Here
Forum   Reviews   Rules   Legal   Site Supporters & Donations   Advertise

Go Back   1911Forum > >


Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2003, 06:42 AM
drabchoi drabchoi is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13
Recoil reducing Guide rod

I'm interested in reducing the recoil on my PII with one of the following aftermarket guide rods.: There are the onepiece tungstan guide rods, Harrts rod that is filled with Mercury and a steel ball bearing, and the dual spring guide rod from Nowlin....All in the Brownells catalog...Anyone here with any experience with each, positive and negative?
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2003, 07:34 AM
Pampers Pampers is offline
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: The Lost State of Franklin
Age: 69
Posts: 622
Reducing FELT Recoil

The Tungston Rod adds Weight in the Muzzle, and thus reduces Muzzle Flip.

The Harts' also adds Weight, but the Mercury/Ball Bearing Mechanism helps spread out the Recoil Impulse over Time, thus reducing the "felt" Recoil.

The multiple Spring Setup of the Nowlin also spreads out the Recoil Impulse.

All work to reduce felt Recoil. None actually reduce actual Recoil. The only way to do that is to go to lower powered Loads.

Personally, I'd go with the Harts', but then, I have no Experience with the Nowlin.

Going to a heavier Recoil Spring also reduces felt Recoil, as does going to a heavier Bullet with the same Power Factor as a lighter Bullet. ie: Try a 250 gr. Bullet with the same PF as a 185 gr. Bullet. The 185 gr. will have a much more "Snappy" Recoil Impulse.
Your Most Humble & Obedient Servant,
Fred J. Drumheller
NRA Life
USPSA RO A-43910
IDPA A09967
Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2003, 10:07 PM
drabchoi drabchoi is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13
anyone try the STI recoilmaster>?
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2003, 01:28 AM
MEH92 MEH92 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 2,237
I had a Harts guide rod (mercury filled) in a Glock 23. It didn't seem to make too much of a difference in recoil reduction. Maybe it helped a little but it wasn't much.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2003, 01:38 AM
Quickloader Quickloader is offline
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 58
Sprinco CorBon devices in SIG P226, P229

very satisfied

Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 04:20 PM
Ramshackle Ramshackle is offline
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 306
IME, the recoil reducing stuff seem to make the biggest difference in feel using hot loads. I've used everything but the Harrt's and can't see much of a difference when shooting IPSC major loads.

Check Brian Enos' forum re: problems with the STI RM. Seems like a lot are breaking. Sprinco's are better built, although they may not reduce the felt recoil as much as the STI.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 05:58 AM
t-tac t-tac is offline
Join Date: Sep 2001
Age: 54
Posts: 1,028
It's not cheap, but the best way to reduce recoil in a 1911 is to put more weight out front.
The Coned barrels on the Les Baer Prowler and the Wilson Combat tactical Elite Do this well.
The Heavy Monolith might also work.
This is why all the revolver makers went to a heavy ribbed barrel like the Colt python.
Need the weight out front by the muzzle.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 07:30 AM
mike benedict mike benedict is offline
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: jasper ga
Posts: 976
I don't think much of any of the devices. Really not wotth much (or anything)

I have a new Accu-match recoil reducing guide rod (Springco type)
you can have it to play with if you want. I think it sells for $50 bucks or something.

Just don't send it back when you are done.

Mike Benedict
Talon Tactical Holsters
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.

NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS SITE: By continuing to use this site, you certify that you have read and agree to abide by the Legal Terms of Use. All information, data, text or other materials ("Content") posted to this site by any users are the sole responsibility of those users. 1911Forum does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such Content.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2015, LLC. All Rights Reserved