interchangeability of parts for a PT1911? - 1911Forum
1911Forum
Advertise Here
Forum   Reviews   Rules   Legal   Site Supporters & Donations   Advertise


Go Back   1911Forum > >

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2011, 07:33 AM
upjeeper upjeeper is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
interchangeability of parts for a PT1911?

I've heard a rumor that while the Taurus 1911 is a great piece of equipment, Taurus decided to make some parts proprietary. example, you have to use Taurus magazines. Is that true?
What other pieces are not interchangable with other 1911s?

I had a springfield GI but sold it to buy an xD, thinking about a taurus now (I have a PT92 now that's great, but want another 1911)

thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2011, 10:34 AM
Bullitt2075 Bullitt2075 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 635
I use chip mccormick 8 and 10 round power magazines in my PT1911 without a single issue. So not it's not true regarding the magazines.

There are parts in the gun that are proprietary such as the locking hammer and sights but many manufacturers make versions for the PT1911.
__________________
XD-9 * P232 * PT1911 * Stag Arms - 3L * Mossberg 500 * Kel-Tec PF9, PMR30 & RFB * AR-15 300 Blackout

Hornady LNL AP Press - RCBS Rangemaster 750 Scale - RCBS Lock-Out Die (get one it could save your gun and fingers)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2011, 07:30 PM
popplecop popplecop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centeral Wisconsin
Posts: 256
I have Taurus PT1911s in .45, 38 Super and 9mm and use magazines from several different manufactures in each one. Have from 6-10 magazines in each caliber and the only Taurus magazines I use are the 2 issued with the pistol.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #4  
Old 10-05-2011, 09:22 PM
chuntaro chuntaro is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Near the Rio Bravo
Posts: 7,730
The use of the term proprietary can apply to a design specification in addition to the particular dimensions of a particular part. There is no guarantee any aftermarket parts will fit a Taurus or other 1911 on a drop in basis. Having said that, I am told Taurus collaborated with other names in the industry in preparation for manufacture of their own 1911. Magazine swaps can be problematic or present no problem whatsoever in terms of function. In terms of fit alone, any 1911 magazine should not be a problem. Getting back to function, much of that depends on various spring weights, the height and angle of the follower, the shape of a particular bullet and the oal of a loaded cartridge, etc. To say any 1911 has a problem with magazine x is neither an indictment of the pistol or brand of magazine. Other examples of the same brand of gun and magazine can give a different result.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2011, 10:31 PM
Burgs Burgs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 9,139
My Taurus PT-1911 .45 works with any and all mags that I've stuck in it.
I had a Wilson hammer put on it just to get rid of the lock - the trigger pull was already really good.

The sight dovetails are a propriety cut which require Heinie or Novak Taurus-specific replacements (available via Brownells) unless you want to do extra milling, but I think the replacement Taurus-specific Heinie night sights are really good, so I'm happy with that too.

From what I've read, and from what my gunsmith tells me, there doesn't seem to be other Taurus-only parts that can't be replaced by a proper gunsmith. A kitchen table bubba might not be so lucky.
__________________
Cordially, ~Burgs


"I've been up early my whole life, and all that ever did was increase the amount of time during the day something could go wrong." ~ Inspector O
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2011, 11:13 PM
hattrick hattrick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
I put a Wilson Combat bullet proof extractor in my PT 1911 and it would not retain the dumbell plunger. I put in the spacer and did a series 80 delete and no more porblems! Also installed a WC slide stop and ejector after it broke. The SS did neet some fitting but that is normal. Chip McCormic mags work fine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2011, 08:47 PM
Bajablast Bajablast is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Age: 54
Posts: 149
I have a PT1911ALR.

A friend did series 80 delete, and installed the spacer on mine. He also installed a Wison Combat hammer.

I am using a Hogue wraparound grip, but I had to cut a little material away for the right side of the ambi safety to move smoothly.

Wilson 47D mags work flawlessly.
__________________
Capitalism is BO$$!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2020, 09:32 PM
Gunsmith1 Gunsmith1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Mount Pleasant
Posts: 1
Just plain 1911ís

Hello all, I am the New(old) guy on this forum and thanks for letting me enjoy this form. Well I'm almost 65, been shooting since I was around 7 years of age, and been working on kinds of firearms for around well over 40 years on all types of weapons. So many times I've overheard people talking about 1911's since they are a very popular firearm. I've been reading a lot of posts on this site about these pistols and quite a few of them have a lot of good info. I myself got ahold of a Taurus PT 1911, wanting to see what kind of pistol they are they made and shoot. And I'll have to say I was pretty impressed on its fit and finish and how well it shot. I did have to throat and polish the barrel in order to better fire hollow point ammo. Over the years I've had quite a few 1911's, everything From Springfields when they first came out with there 1911's to 70 & 80 series Gold Cups. I use to build them when someone bought a new gun and more money in accessories that than what the Gun cost new. And the main thing I could see is everyone should worry more about the Gun itself than the name of it. As far as I can see the Taurus is built pretty well with its hammer forged barrel and Frame. I don't really care for thier hammer with it's little built-in safety (seems kind of silly). The 1911 has plenty of safeties already on it. Plus it shoots pretty well. So that's just my 2 Cents
Thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM.


NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS SITE: By continuing to use this site, you certify that you have read and agree to abide by the Legal Terms of Use. All information, data, text or other materials ("Content") posted to this site by any users are the sole responsibility of those users. 1911Forum does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such Content.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2015 1911Forum.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved