Not a 1911 but Cool nonetheless! - 1911Forum
1911Forum
Advertise Here
Forum   Reviews   Rules   Legal   Site Supporters & Donations   Advertise


Go Back   1911Forum > >

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2020, 01:26 PM
GreasyStool GreasyStool is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 21
Not a 1911 but Cool nonetheless!

Looky what came home from GunBroker! A 1974 Walther PP Super in 9 Ultra. Looks brand new, amazing! Always wanted one of these but ammo has been an issue. So I did some research. Loaded up some 9x18 Mak cases sized in 9 MM Dies with .355 90-95gr .380 bullets, worked like a champ! Feed, cycle, eject like they were made for it, fit the chamber perfectly. They end up looking like 9 Mak rounds cause the magazines are made for truncated bullets not round nose ones......so you have to seat round nose FMJ's little deeper than normal. Using .380 load data. Dimensions are generous enough that Mak cases fit the breech faces on ALL my .380's. CZ, 82/83's Sig 238, Browning BDA, Walther PPK, Colt 1908 and even my Husqvarna 1907. They won't chamber all the way in the .380's cause the case is tapered and bigger in diameter. Didn't anyone ever try using Mak cases sized in 9 MM Dies? No split or bulged cases like you would get using 380's in the 9 MM Ultra. Can't believe the gun looks brand new, 1974! Started reloading .380's and everything else since 1982ish. You almost can't tell the difference between Mak cases sized and loaded with 90, 95 JHP's and cast 100 gr bullets over the real 9 Ultra ammo! The gun can't tell the difference between Fiocchi 100 gr FMJ's and my reloads using 9 Mak cases sized for .355 bullets!






Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2020, 01:57 PM
ope135's Avatar
ope135 ope135 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,463
Very cool gun. Almost bid on one recently, but as you note, ammo can be an issue. Looks like you solved for that.

Enjoy.
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
NRA Benefactor Member
USAR - Ordnance Corps
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2020, 02:11 PM
Hawkeye fan Hawkeye fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 40
Posts: 6,371
Nice.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #4  
Old 05-10-2020, 06:53 PM
Piexcel Piexcel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 3,555
Very cool pistol, relatively rare, and designed in response the the 1972 Munich Massacre. If you can find one in 380 ACP, those are cool and very rare.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2020, 09:47 PM
dsk's Avatar
dsk dsk is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 70,652
Interesting pistol, I never knew they existed. Ain't it fun to have something that you know virtually nobody else on your block has?
__________________
Avoid the temptation to replace everything on your brand-new 1911 just to make it "better". Know what you're changing out and why. You may spend a lot of money fixing things that weren't broken to begin with. Shoot at least 500 rounds through it first, then decide what you don't like and want to improve. Regarding vintage 1911s, pre-1970 pistols are highly collectible in original, unaltered condition and should NEVER be refinished or modified as it completely ruins their monetary value.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2020, 10:29 PM
subscriber subscriber is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 5,191
I have never seen that model Walther before.

It took me even longer to see this one, due the tears in my eyes from laughing so hard at the OP's user name . I hope that is not seen as mocking. Rather, the intended mirth.
__________________
You can't reason people out of a position they didn't reason their way into...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2020, 12:53 AM
Flight Medic's Avatar
Flight Medic Flight Medic is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreasyStool View Post
<snip>
Loaded up some 9x18 Mak cases sized in 9 MM Dies with .355 90-95gr .380 bullets, worked like a champ! Feed, cycle, eject like they were made for it, fit the chamber perfectly. They end up looking like 9 Mak rounds cause the magazines are made for truncated bullets not round nose ones......so you have to seat round nose FMJ's little deeper than normal. Using .380 load data. Dimensions are generous enough that Mak cases fit the breech faces on ALL my .380's. CZ, 82/83's Sig 238, Browning BDA, Walther PPK, Colt 1908 and even my Husqvarna 1907. They won't chamber all the way in the .380's cause the case is tapered and bigger in diameter. Didn't anyone ever try using Mak cases sized in 9 MM Dies?
</snip>
That sounds like a tremendous pain in the ass. But congrats.
__________________
SAVE OUR COUNTRY - VOTE TRUMP 2020
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.


NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS SITE: By continuing to use this site, you certify that you have read and agree to abide by the Legal Terms of Use. All information, data, text or other materials ("Content") posted to this site by any users are the sole responsibility of those users. 1911Forum does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such Content.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2015 1911Forum.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved