1911Forum
Forum   Reviews   Rules   Legal   Site Supporters & Donations   Advertise


Go Back   1911Forum > 1911 Manufacturers > Springfield Armory


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2004, 10:28 PM
CarbineCaleb CarbineCaleb is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
MA Compliant Springfields!




When will Springfield Arms have their fine line of pistols certified as MA - compliant? Smith & Wesson, Sig Arms, Beretta, Para Ordnance, and now Glock have done it! I heard a quote somewhere (paraphrased here) that it was too difficult and confusing a process. Well somehow, 5 other companies have gotten their semiautos certified ahead of Springfield, so it must be very doable!
Massachusetts NEEDS Springfield Arms!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2004, 11:39 AM
SockPuppet SockPuppet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hiding in the shade of a tumble weed
Posts: 527
What does it take to be MA compliant? The included spent casing?
__________________
Real trucks don't have spark plugs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2004, 03:13 PM
CarbineCaleb CarbineCaleb is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
I am not the expert on this, but as far as I know, they would only need a "second serial number" and then to be submitted to an independent firearms lab for testing. MA law requires an additional serial number to be stamped into some hidden portion of the gun, so that if a bad guy tries to file off the visible serial number, it can likely still be traced by law enforcement if involved in a crime. That doesn't seem real tough to me...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2004, 03:32 PM
Seraph Seraph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Secret City, TN
Posts: 3,567
Nah, catering to MA's ridiculous restrictions isn't the way. MA just needs to pull it's collective head out of it's collective 4th point of contact.
__________________
Under the sword lifted high, there is Hell, making you tremble. But go ahead, and you have the land of Bliss. ~ Miyamoto Musashi

DISCLOSURE: I represent SECRET CITY WEAPONEERS, purveyor of ISOTOPE 7 Concealment Holsters. I may, therefore, be biased...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2004, 05:28 PM
CarbineCaleb CarbineCaleb is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Ahhh, a very intelligent, well-reasoned and mature discussion. I have a lot of respect for you, seraph.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2004, 07:24 PM
Shifty Shifty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 15
I lived in Mass from many years and was SO happy to move to New Hampshire. The first thing I did was to order a TRP Professional which is due NEXT WEEK!

Regarding Mass law, I am not an expert either BUT I know it requires the second serial number as well as a loaded round indicator, very high trigger pull (don't remember how much), and a bunch of testing. I contacted Springfield and asked if they intended to submit their loaded model considering that it had almost everything already. Their reply was to say that the Mass laws are very confusing (100% agree) and they wouldn't submit until it was clear.

Go to fsguns.com for some further explanation as well as a great place to buy guns in Mass.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-24-2006, 07:41 PM
PSI357 PSI357 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbineCaleb
Smith & Wesson, Sig Arms, Beretta, Para Ordnance, and now Glock have done it!
Don't get too exited about all of these models either. I know at least GLOCK did indeed make the compliant list, however Mr. Riely has his own list for us. I was told by my dealer that you still con't buy new GLOCKs here. Just because they are on the Mass compliant list does't mean they are Mass approved . There was a small window open to buy them before the AG slamed it shut. (and I heard they tried to get those back )

Gun companies have to supply a certain # of firearms per model for Mass to perform there tests on, and pay to have it done. That doesn't mean they will pass and passing doesn't nessesarily mean will be aproved for sale. Companies don't want to pay substantial amounts of money to pay for their guns to be abused for a maybe. It took me over a year to figure this much out. The laws here are utterly ridiculous!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.


NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS SITE: By continuing to use this site, you certify that you have read and agree to abide by the Legal Terms of Use. All information, data, text or other materials ("Content") posted to this site by any users are the sole responsibility of those users. 1911Forum does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such Content.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2011 1911Forum.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved