1911Forum
Forum   Reviews   Rules   Legal   Site Supporters & Donations   Advertise


Go Back   1911Forum > 1911 Manufacturers > Colt


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2002, 10:30 PM
Grey Grey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 68
Size comparison- Commander, Defender, Officers......




In order from big to small how do the Colt Commander, Defender, Officer and Compact compare in size?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2002, 12:57 AM
SkaerE SkaerE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 164
goverment, commander, officer, defender...didnt know they made a "compact"

BTW, as far as i understand, the grip doesnt get shorter until the officer, the commander just has a shorter slide
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2002, 04:02 AM
GCT00427 GCT00427 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 1,218
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe it is as follows.

Commander 4.25" barrel.
Officers 3.5" barrel.
Defender 3.0" barrel.

I believe that the Defender is Colt's compact if I'm not mistaken. The grip frame on the Commander is the same as a full size. The grip frame on the Officers and defender is shorter. There was the Concealed Carry Officers model with the 4.25" slide and the shorter Officer frame which many people really like.


Chuck
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2002, 09:56 AM
potthawg potthawg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ARKANSAS
Posts: 1,792
SIZE COMPARISONS

Govt. full size grip with 5" barrel.

Commander full size grip 4.25" barrel.

Compact and Officers have reduced grip 3.5" barrel

Defender same as previous with 3" barrel.
__________________
PISS A LIBERAL OFF

BUY A HANDGUN....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2002, 11:42 AM
Brian48 Brian48 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Moonbat city (Boston), MA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,954
I wonder how much of a velocity loss that would be going from a 5" barrel to a 3" one? I mean the .45 is a fairly slow moving bullet as it is and a 3" barrel is really a 2" barrel if you exclude the length of the chamber. Would there even be enough velocity for most hollowpoints to expand?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2002, 11:50 AM
Richie Richie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pacific time zone
Posts: 173
I think compact was the designation of the early Officer sized 1991s. Back when Colt offered more model 1911s the 90s. They offered so many in the 70s and 80s we still can't figure them all out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2002, 11:54 AM
SkaerE SkaerE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 164
i posted the same question one time concerning my HK USP 45 Compact (3.8'') barrel VS a Colt Govnt model (5'') aparantly it depends on the type of rifling cause they chronoed almost exactly the same (give or take 10fps)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.


NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS SITE: By continuing to use this site, you certify that you have read and agree to abide by the Legal Terms of Use. All information, data, text or other materials ("Content") posted to this site by any users are the sole responsibility of those users. 1911Forum does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such Content.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2011 1911Forum.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved