1911Forum
Forum   Reviews   Rules   Legal   Site Supporters & Donations   Advertise


Go Back   1911Forum > General > General Gun Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:05 PM
RiskPro RiskPro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Magnaport on Colt Defender??????




Magnaport....Godd or Bad Idea to reduce recoil?

I've read this can impair low light vision and produces more sound. Some posts also say there is no reduction in recoil or muzzle flip. I emailed Magna port and they said it would make a 20 to 30% reduction.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:14 PM
Auto Mag Auto Mag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Age: 59
Posts: 5,319
I had my Colt Delta Elite Mag-Na-Ported back in 1989 and I personally will say that it did reduce the felt recoil a little bit!! When shooting in a low light situation it does put out a very noticeable muzzle flash that could temporarily "blind" you in a defensive situation!!! It also puts a lot of powder residue on the barrel and slide that can be tough to remove.








__________________
"This is the 44 Magnum Auto Mag and holds a 300 grain cartridge and if properly used it can remove the fingerprints."

COTEP Member # CBOB0152
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:17 PM
MSgt Dotson MSgt Dotson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,772
The ports would reduce flip somewhat, moreso with the lighter/faster JHP bullets I'd expect....

Unfortunately, a 26 ounce alloy pistol bucks a tad, but, it's still not too bad with two hands, and it stops hurting once the shooting stops. The ports would not be my first choice for a pistol that may be fired when held close to your own ribcage from a retention position, unless you are positive you will remember to cant the pistol 45 degrees or so to the side to avoid upward muzzle blast gasses.

My verdict: pass on the ports!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:17 PM
RiskPro RiskPro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Any regerets?

Would you do it again? or do the cons outweigh the pro in your opinion?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:46 PM
RiskPro RiskPro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Msgt -

Thanks for the advice as always. Very good points.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-26-2010, 10:29 PM
LtlBear LtlBear is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 112
I would assume the Defender is a carry gun. Ports make no sense to me on a carry gun. Get a grip and man up. They don't kick that bad. Return to POA may be a tad longer, but that's a 3" gun for you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2010, 03:14 PM
Happy G Happy G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tennessee
Age: 44
Posts: 106
You could always magna-port it, and get a solid barrel for carry.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2010, 03:26 PM
nmgonzo nmgonzo is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 488
Leave it alone
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:32 PM
GT40DOC GT40DOC is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Az
Posts: 2,937
I own a number of big bore weapons that were either ported at the factory, or sent to Magna Port for their magic. Obviously, I like to shoot ported guns, and the "night thing" has not been a problem(only tried it twice though).
__________________
NHRA LIFE MEMBER
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-27-2010, 07:35 PM
Triggerbender Triggerbender is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 435
I live just up the road from Magna Port and have many a weapon thru their doors.

Just a note, the shorter the barrel the less leverage the gas port has on muzzle flip. The longer the barrel to a POINT the better porting works. Also depends on what cartridge you are trying to tame, works better on higher pressure rds. that produce alot of gas, IMHO a 45acp does not qualify.

It's kind of like using a cheater bar on a wrench vs. the wrench alone.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-27-2010, 08:29 PM
RiskPro RiskPro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Great feedback

For now I'm going to sit tight based on all the thoughts.

The issue is that I like to shoot 300 to 500 rounds every time I visit the range.

So, I'm not concerned with recoil in a self-defense situation.

I just got some 185gr for the range and plan to carry at that or lower. Such as the Corbon or Federal Low Recoils.

Maybe a heavier Wolff Spring Pack to experiment with.

Will report back this weekend after I burn off a few hundred 185s....

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-27-2010, 08:37 PM
MEH92 MEH92 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 2,017
Ports have drawbacks on fighting handguns. I think the drawbacks outweigh the slight benefit in recoil reduction.

For the last 9 years I have been required to carry a Glock 22C on duty and have seen 1st hand what these drawbacks are. The ports blow gas and flash upward towards the shooter's face, particularly in CQB-retention techniques. They are also nosier than non-ported guns, although that's a minor issue IMHO.

I would leave them off a fighting handgun.
__________________
Mitch Houser
NRA Life Member
www.righttocarryllc.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-30-2010, 11:20 AM
RiskPro RiskPro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Update........

Not going to M-Port based on feedback re strategic comments from members and I fired the 185gr rounds and the diff 4 me is night and day. Truly could shoot 500 rnd sessions without signficant stress fatigue.

No need to think of magnaport, heavier springs, etc.

Practicing with these and the new Fed or Hornady low recoil ammo should fit the bill.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS SITE: By continuing to use this site, you certify that you have read and agree to abide by the Legal Terms of Use. All information, data, text or other materials ("Content") posted to this site by any users are the sole responsibility of those users. 1911Forum does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such Content.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2011 1911Forum.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved