|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Over Penetration
I keep reading about concerns of over penetration. Personnally, I've never read of such an issue. Can anyone point out any confirmable data of someone being hit by an over penetration bullet. Better yet,any documented person being charged legally of shooting another thru over penetration?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good question, subscribed.
__________________
Is there any hope for a person, who is brainwashed to the point of believing that bearing arms is responsible for a violent disposition in the human psyche? -me |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
i think most of the worries of over penetration that are talked about are in a home defense situation where you could possibly injure a loved one in the home, ie: miss or flesh would someone and the round goes through a bedroom wall and hit your wife-kid-dog. that kinda thing
__________________
aim small, hit small |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The problem arises more when you're in your home and you are worried about the bullet go through some guy and then through a wall and then into your neighbors bedroom. It depends on what kind of house you have. Mine is brick for instance so I think I'm relatively ok. But if you have wood sidings or something of the like you may have to think about it. Honestly though, if someone is in my house with a weapon of their own, the last thing I'll probably be worried about is if I'm about to shoot toward my neighbors house.
__________________
S&W 1911SC Performance Center, S&W 1911SC E series, Kimber Ultra Carry 2 NRA Member "All you need for happiness is a good gun, a good horse, and a good wife." -Daniel Boone |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
When ~90% of rounds fired completely miss the target in LEO and SD incidents, why is overpenetration a consideration? More accurate shooting will result in less deaths/injuries of bystanders. The .357 mag revolvers and 1911's are more accurate than polymer autos. Less capacity is needed with them.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just one more shot, sir.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Understanding penetration
There are those that probably know a lot about "over penetration" so the following information may not be new and probably boring. The following is a general guideline about the penetration characteristics of ammunition.
The ballistic penetration of any ammunition is greatly affected by: 1) The hardness and diameter size of the bullet. Given the same velocity of a round and only changing the hardness and size of the bullet, the harder and smaller the bullet (diameter) the more the penetration. 2) The terminal velocity and mass of the bullet when it hits an object has a great effect on the penetration. The greater the velocity and the heavier the bullet weight (mass) at impact of soft animal tissue, the greater the chance of deeper penetration. Greater velocity and greater mass means more kinetic energy of the bullet. A bullet fired with a velocity of 1000 fps at impact may exhibit much greater penetration if the same load has only 500 fps at impact caused by the declining velocity at an extreme distance. Given the same bullet weight, and lowering the velocity means less kinetic energy transfer. 3) The density and the shape of the bullet has a great affect on the ability of a bullet to penetrate. Generally speaking, a FMJ profile will penetrate more than a JHP, since the hollow point will tend to expand and may induce a larger wound cavity with less penetration. Also, JHP bullets may fragment much easier when striking solid objects, rather than riccochet. Some bullets, like the frangible variety, may be made up of birdshot in an expoxy glue, and the bullet is less dense. These bullets often provide the least amount of penetration in soft tissue when used in handguns, but if a vital area is hit such as the lung or heart, can cause massive tissue damage. 4) The gyroscopic stability of a bullet in flight may greatly affect the penetration. A bullet that has minimal gyroscopic stability in flight, may keyhole or tumble when it strikes soft tissue. A bullet that tumbles may not penetrate like a bullet that has the rotational stability of a drill. Rifle rounds are known to leave the barrel of a gun in an unstable rotation, then finally come to full gyroscopic stability within 50 - 75 yds from the muzzle. Rifle shooters often describe this as "the bullet goes to sleep." It is analagous to a spinning top. When you first throw a child's top, it may start rotating in an erratic pattern until it attains gyroscopic stability and spins purely around its axis. The late Gen. Julian Hatcher showed pictures in his book "Hatcher's Notebook" of the penetration of a FMJ 30.06 projectile shot into a solid block of oak approximatley 3.5 feet in diameter at distances of 25 yards and 100 yards. The solid oak blocks were cut on a huge saw perfectly in line with the center of the bullet penetration path to show how the bullet reacted once it penetrated the wood. The 25 yd bullet had not reached full gyroscopic stability, and the bullet keyholed and travelled in an erratic pattern (zigzagged) in the wood for perhaps 20 inches of depth. The bullet fired at the 100 yd wood block, looked like someone had taken a drill press, and bored the wood block in a straight line. The bullet had reached 100% stability, and penetrated the wood oak block to a depth of 36 inches. Generally speaking, a rifle bullet with a long bearing surface may need a faster twist rate on the barrel to attain ideal gyroscopic stability. An AR-15 with a 1:9 twist barrel, may shoot a 55 gr bullet fine, but may not attain full gyroscopic stability using a 77 grain bullet. A faster barrel twist, such as a 1:8 twist may shoot heavier longer .224" diameter bullets with greater accuracy due to better rotation of the bullet. When I hunted wild hogs with a hand gun, I wanted good penetration, and rather than buy an expensive JHP bullet, I simply used my own cast lead bullets, with a high Brinnel hardness, by using straight linotype lead, and quenched in water after knocking them out of the bullet mold. The bullet was a Keith style .44 mag cast bullet that weighed 260 grains. It was highly effective for hog hunting with outstanding penetration. When it comes to worrying about "overpenetration" all of the above factors will affect the ability of the projectile to penetrate soft tissue. Last edited by richpetrone; 04-26-2012 at 06:26 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary Roberts wrote this excellent post on the subject over at http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=56486
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even though I like living in California for other reasons, lots of good riding weather and places to go. I live in a wood/Stuco house and living in liberal California, this is something I have to be concerned about. I am not going to obsess about it but I do have to keep it in mind that if I ever have to use my gun at home there is a possibility that one of my rounds may go where I don't want it to go. With that in mind I feel that using the right kind of home defense ammo and shot placement can minimize the issue somewhat but not totally. There have been lots of studies done about how bullets penetrate through ballistic gel and most have shown that bullets can penetrate through as much as 12-18 inches and still have the energy to continue through walls that are mostly wood and other soft structure. Am I going to lose sleep about it and not use my weapon if the need arises, no but I am conscience of it and accept that there may be other issues I have to deal with should the need ever arise.
![]() As said many times on here each and everyone of us has to weigh all the issues and decide what we are willing to do. YMMV Tracy
__________________
"Life's short, enjoy every sandwich" (Warren Zevon) |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Most current construction brick houses are a brick fisad which I imagine a bullet would travel through. However many modern hollow points are frangable. As far as the original question goes. I know it's a large concern for srt and other entry teams as they often use 556 rifles. I have never read of a person being sued due to overpenatration. I wouldn't like to be the first though. Makes sense to spend a few bucks on some HPs
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
A year or so ago some dummy in Virginia was apparently fondling a 12-gauge in his 2nd story bedroom. It discharged, blowing a hole in the wall of his house and some buckshot struck a lady next door who was in her backyard.
The same thing could easily happen with a handgun bullet. Even a .45 JHP can go through drywall and plywood and have enough energy to kill someone. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are ways around this gentlemen, first of all, let's face it, handguns are not the most efficient defensive weapons. Most calibers require multiple hits, there's over-penetration, ad -infinatum.
Now, if there are kids in the house, choices are truly limited but, if not then a static-defense is best. This means a shotgun can be used very effectively. For example, while I keep a 1911 handy, my main home-defense gun is a Norinco M97 Trenchgun loaded with Traploads. Before all you 'Armchair Ballisticians' scream about penetration, I've done some testing. At 21 feet, these loads, out of the Norinco, will put an approximately 2-1/2" diameter hole clean through 3/4" plywood. Much denser than human tissue, to be sure but, did not completely penetrate a simulated Drywall wall set up three feet behind it made with standard-grade 3/4" drywall, four-inch studs and another piece of 3/4" Drywall. I saw, in my repeated testing, no penetration problems such as shallow penetration. There are places where a handgun is better, CCW for example since most Authorities frown apon people walking around with ARs and Shotguns. Plus, on open ground, a handgun is more accurate and less likely to throw pellets around at distance like a shotgun would. It's a matter of picking the right tool for the job guys.
__________________
Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas Jeff Cooper COTEP#CBOB0428 Msgt., USAF,Ret. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would also be interested in cases where overpenetration of a round killed someone. No doubt it has been done.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think a lot comes down to what kind of caliber is being shot if its a SD situation outside the house. If some schmuck is carring a 44mag/ 10mm/ 500sw/ or any other heavy hitting magnums or magnum like calibers and decides to use something like hard cast lead +p ammo, ammo thats meant to penetrate thick skin animals, and uses it in an SD situation in a public place there is a great chance for over penetration and possible death or injury to bystanders.
Also calibers like the Russian 7.62x25 in surplus ammo have the capability to defeat police vests so if the same shooter uses that for SD in the same public place there is the same chance for death or injury to bystanders. Or an AK47 pistol. Also you never know who you'll need to protect yourself from. Is the BD an avg wheight person? A person whos muscular, or one who is 400lbs of flab. How about an 80lb crackhead. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would think that HP's will fragment quite a bit when they strike an object and be alot less likely to have the same penetration force as a FMJ.... I think so anyways, anyone care to chime in?
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-1...al-center-wall http://www.heraldextra.com/news/loca...9bb2963f4.html http://www.kgw.com/home/Aloha-man-sh...137383893.html I can find some drive by's where pistols and long guns were used. People and kids inside killed by the penitration. Accidents with death, etc... Is it that hard to believe? Or that hard to find stories? |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
CavCop: Not one of your examples concerns what was asked. People either purposely or accidentaly shooting thru walls has no bearing on question asked. Drive by shootings are also not germaine to the question at hand.
I specifically asked for info on a person being shot by another AND the bullet passing thru and striking another. I am only questioning over penetration of the human body and striking another. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Handgun Bullets that Don't Work
If a handgun bullet cannot penitrate a sheet rock wall missing the 2x4 stud without killing the person behind that wall it is useless for self defence and will likely get you killed in such a situtiation.
CavCop did not make any statements in that I have issue with.Read the 1 page.They are for Sky Martials and other type special situtations not general purpose aplications. It is a rare occurence with hollow point ammo and even FMJ. In said cases would a few inchs less have mattered, or were they bad shots anyway,that it was used as an excuse?
Last edited by supervel; 04-26-2012 at 06:51 PM. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like over-penetration, then there are two holes for the .............to bleed out!
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
GASBOFFER, no argument.
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is an old topic that has caused the progress of bullets and ammo,but it isn't a generalized question.
I like a 45 for a SD pistol,in the FL summer and at normal "encountered" ranges I'm not carrying a FMJ.A pure tissue hit will blow right through and opens up collateral damage issues.Technically the outcome falls on the perp that caused the situation,but you have to deal with the fact personally and the douche lawyers will do everything they can to make that even worse. Conversely using a HP in the north when it's below freezing,belly shot in their 1/4 keg,etc. isn't a wise choice either.The exact situation can't be forseen so it's a matter of weighing the present situation that can happen and pulling a compromise.
__________________
Liberalism isn't a political view,it's a mental disease. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
I sometimes have my Colts loaded with hard lswc's, fmj or xtp's, if a situation developes for use of one or the other, whatever is loaded at the time will be what goes down the barrel, no second guessing, none.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|